News Taxes

Federal Court Decision on promotion of home ownership: Relaxation of provisions?

The promotion of home ownership with funds from the occupational pension plan ("WEF") is, among other restrictions, in principle only possible for owner-occupied residential property (own use) and must be repaid in the event of a sale (or economically equivalent thereto). However, the Federal Supreme Court has now rejected the repayment claim of the pension fund in a case (BGE 9C_293/2020) with WEF advance withdrawal and later rental.


In the present case, an apartment was co-financed by the WEF advance withdrawal in 2003 and was also owner-occupied until it was rented to a third party as of 2016.


The Federal Supreme Court states that as long as the residential property is not sold and is rented to a third party with the usual notice period of three months, the funds from the WEF advance withdrawal remain tied up. Accordingly, no repayment is triggered by a sale of the residential property. However, the Federal Supreme Court makes the reservation and restricts the above statements again that a WEF advance withdrawal would be contrary to its purpose if the intention was to rent the property to a third party (as an investment) from the beginning.


In this respect, a WEF advance withdrawal will continue to be possible only for personal use. According to the Federal Supreme Court, however, a residential property co-financed by an advance withdrawal from the WEF may be rented out after years of own use without triggering a repayment of the advance withdrawal to the pension fund.


For any further questions or advice, please contact Remo Merz, Swiss certified tax expert,


Follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date.


WHAT we do is not unique, but HOW we do it.


Remo Merz, 30 July 2021


Keywords: Tax, Federal Court Decision on promotion, home ownership